en

News / General News

Weekly China Brand Protection News – May 29, 2024

2024-05-29

Weekly China Brand Protection News

May 29, 2024

1. The registration of the “A2” mark on milk related goods was recognized as having distinctiveness and unlikely to cause confusion

The A2 Milk Company Limited is the registrant of the “A2” trademark with reg. no. 14013718, designated on “milk; milk products” and other goods. Nestlé Products Co., Ltd. (“Nestlé”) filed an invalidation request claiming that the “A2” mark constitutes generic name on milk products, milk powder, and other goods. When used on milk and other goods, it directly expresses the nutritional content and other characteristics of the designated goods and lacks the distinctive features that a trademark should have. At the same time, its registration may easily cause confusion to the public regarding the quality and origin of the goods.

The court found that “A2” is not an inherent vocabulary and has no specific meaning. It is not directly related to the characteristics or quality of the goods such as “milk; milk products” used in the disputed trademark. The evidence cannot prove when using “A2” on its approved goods such as “milk; milk products” the public can naturally associate it with “vitamin A2” or “A2β-casein” based on their general understanding, and cause confusion with the disputed trademark.

As to whether the disputed trademark is a generic name, the determination falls on the factual status on the date of trademark application. Nestlé failed to submit evidence to prove that relevant professional reference books and dictionaries have listed “A2” as the product name of “milk; milk products” and other goods. Most of the evidence submitted by Nestlé such as the publicity and usage of its peers, the publicity of video websites, online reports, and journal articles were later than the application date or the registration of the disputed trademark. The evidence submitted by Nestlé before the filing date of the disputed trademark mainly includes relevant journal articles and some media reports, but the content is mainly research and introduction of A2β-casein and does not directly reflect the association between “A2” and “milk; milk products” and other goods. It also was not sufficient to reflect the relevant public’s awareness of “milk; milk products” and other goods across the country. Therefore, the evidence on record submitted by Nestlé is not enough to prove that “A2” has been generally recognized as a generic name that can refer to “milk; milk products” and other goods by the relevant public on the application date of the disputed trademark and at the time of approval of registration.

Regarding Nestlé’s claim that the disputed trademark is a simple combination of letters and numbers and does not have inherent distinctiveness, the court found that “A2” is not a fixed combination of letters and numbers, has no inherent meaning, and is identifiable in itself. The disputed trademark “A2” has no direct or fixed association with the “milk; milk products” and other goods approved for use. According to the evidence on record submitted by The A2 Milk Company Limited, its “A2” brand has been used among the relevant public in China after long-term publicity. It has a certain degree of popularity and influence and has the distinctive characteristics that a trademark should have.

In summary, the court upheld the registration of the disputed trademark.

2. Top 40 Chinese Trademark Agencies Serving Foreign Clients are released

On May 20, 2024, at the 146th INTA at Atlanta, USA, the China Trademark Association Forum released the “Top 40 Chinese Trademark Agencies Serving Foreign Clients.” The list uses official data to establish a systematic evaluation model from more than ten dimensions, including the number of foreign related trademark applications, foreign related trademark agency opposition cases, and foreign related trademark agency review cases. The model evaluates trademark agencies that have been registered with the Trademark Office of the CNIPA, and selects the top 40 outstanding trademark agencies. East IP is included in the list.

   Follow us on LinkedIn!
Email: trademark@beijingeastip.com
Tel: +86 10 8518 9318 | Fax: +86 10 8518 9338
Address: Suite 1601, Tower E2, Oriental Plaza, 1 East Chang An Ave., Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100738, P.R. China